That's not what i asked about. Who is to say that Jeremy isn't offering Alison drugs, and that Alison isn't taking them because she feels pressurized to keep Jeremy's interest? Maybe Ian's remarks are also supposed to highlight that her behavior is not "normal" for her?Her proactive behaviour when she seeks out Jeremy/Ian on her own. Unlike Holly, who is pushed to every men she should fuck.
The game literally refers to Alison who goes this route as a bimbo. This is, if anything, the extreme form of "corruption" in these games, that goes beyond basic "slutty" behavior of sucking a few cocks.Bleaching your hair and nipple piercings are a significantly milder form of corruption and manipulation (if at all) than doing a glory hole.
The lack of any evidence, and how it undermines these theories when they concern Ivy instead of another character is precisely the point.Besides the lack of any evidence to say otherwise?
Lena potentially never seen Holly fuck, period, and yet her remark is taken as a gospel. As if she is suddenly an expert on both Holly's sex life *and* drugs, when she has potentially never ever taken any herself.Ian also hadn't seen Alison in years and hadn't been in the bedroom with her on that particular path either, so that's hardly concrete.
To be exact, she offers drugs to Lena once. If Lena turns down the offer Ivy herself concludes the next time Lena doesn't want any, and you have to make an active choice there to get drugs from her.And it's not zero info, Ivy does have drugs and pushes them onto Lena twice
Given this, the presumption that Ivy is drugging Holly against Holly's consent is not just far-reaching but actively ignoring/contradicting what the game actually shows us, regarding Ivy and drugs.